Legal Opinion

United States v. Vargas

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 17, 2007No. 1:03-cr-00046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255

HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is the Defendant’s pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, filed on August 7, 2006. On August 9, 2006, the Court reviewed the motion and ordered the Government to file a response. On October 6, 2006, the Government filed a response requesting that the Court deny the Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief. The Defendant filed a reply brief on November 2, 2006. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2025
  2. United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API