In Re Eiland
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
REISSUED MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTORS’ CHAPTER 13 PLAN
JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Introduction
Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan came on for confirmation hearing. No objections were filed. However, this Court has an independent duty to determine that the Plan satisfies the requirements of law before confirming that Plan. 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(1). In re Rimgale, 669 F.2d 426, 431 (7th Cir.1982); McCullough v. Brown, 162 B.R. 506, 508 n. 3 (N.D.Ill.1993); In re Christophe, 151 B.R. 475, 476 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1993).
Without the benefit of briefs by debtors or any parties, the Court reviewed the Plan.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- First of America Bank v. Gaylor (In Re Gaylor)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- In Re KovichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- McCullough v. Brown (In Re Brown)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- In Re Shattuc Cable Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In Re ChapmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re OrawskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re SimmonsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Barnett v. Jamesway Corp. (In Re Jamesway Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re CoxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.