Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Mill Creek Coal & Coke Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1903PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mercer County. Action by A. A. Chapman and others against the Mill Creek Coal & Coke Company and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

MilleR, Judge:

By grant bearing date on the 1st day of July, 1851, there was granted by the Commonwealth of Virginia, to David Hall and Henly Chapman, a tract of land containing 1,750 acres, lying in the counties of Mercer and Tazewell, the greater part thereof being in Mercer. The boundaries are set out in the grant.

On the 5th day of April, 1856, Hall and wife, and Chapman, by their deed, granted to David K. Perdue,, for the consideration of $307.75, that part of-said tract lying in the county of *194Mercer containing about 925 acres, described in the deed by metes and bounds. The deed contains…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Grundy and ThornburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Suttle v. R. F. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  3. Mapel v. JohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hurst v. HurstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Witten v. St. ClairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mylius v. Raine-Andrew Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Deutsch v. Mortgage Securities Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bostic v. BosticSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  4. Erwin v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Totten v. Pocahontas Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API