Barriga v. Arkansas & Missouri Railroad
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.
Pedro Barriga and his wife, Elena Barriga, appeal from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the appellee, the Arkansas and Missouri Railroad Company (the “Railroad”). Appellants argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because a question of material fact existed as to whether the Railroad’s violation of an internal regulation was the proximate cause of his injury. We affirm.
On November 30, 2000, Pedro Barriga approached a railroad crossing while he was traveling eastbound on Highway 12 in Rogers, Arkansas. The railroad…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pollard v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frank Stevenson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Davis v. Schneider National, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Frank Stevenson v. Union Pacific RRCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Dakoda Davis v. Farkhanda John, et al.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.