Buchanan v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MATHERNE, Judge.
The plaintiffs, buyers, sue for specific performance of a contract to sell 42 acres of land and for damages due to the breach of the contract. The chancellor declared the contract invalid and ordered the specific performance of another contract to sell the same property to James Hoyt Taylor. The plaintiffs appeal that decision. We will refer to the plaintiffs’ written contract as the Buchanan contract and the other written contract as the Taylor contract.
I. THE POSITION OF THE PARTIES
The sellers who signed the Buchanan contract were the then owners of the land, the defendants,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Love v. Simm's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Real Estate Management, Inc. v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
- Smith v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
- Cavanagh v. Iowa Beer Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- United States v. Haynes School Dist. No. 8District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Safeco Insurance Company of America v. City of White House, Tennessee, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Harlan v. HardawayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Brandel v. Moore Mortgage & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- Parthasarathy S. Ponnapula v. Cbc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Greg Hearn v. American Wash Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.