Legal Opinion

Smith v. Drug, Chemical, Cosmetic, Plastics & Affiliated Industries Warehouse Employees Local 815

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 19, 1996No. CY 93-5729 (MLO)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff commenced this hybrid action pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, alleging that (1) her employer, Del Laboratories (“Del”), discharged her in violation of an existing collective bargaining agreement, and (2) Drug, Chemical, Cosmetic, Plastics and Affiliated Industries Warehouse Employees Local 815 (the “Union”), her collective bargaining representative, breached its duty of fair- representation in connection with the termination. The Court has jurisdiction over this action…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adelaida Martinez v. Staten Island University Hospital; Karyn Treval, In Her Individual and Official Capacities; and Antoinette Henderson, In Her Individual and Official CapacitiesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
  2. Smith v. DRUG, CHEM. & AFF. WAREHOUSE EMP. LOC. 815District Court, E.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API