Legal Opinion

Random Acres Development Co. v. Tierney

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1979No. WD 29401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Judge.

The issue is whether movant-respondent Poindexter is entitled to $2,000.00 attorney fees, as allowed by the trial court, for services rendered to appellant, Random Acres, prior to his discharge as counsel and substitution of other counsel, where there was a subsequent dismissal of Random Acres petition and no fund was created for its benefit.

On behalf of Random Acres and other plaintiffs, Poindexter, on October 6, 1975, filed a suit against Thomas W. Tierney, Sr., Thomas W. Tierney, II, Robert C. Tierney and Margaret Tierney, seeking in Count I the production of corporate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doggett v. Deauville CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  2. Munday v. ThieleckeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Young v. LevineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas And Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  5. German v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority v. 4550 Main AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API