Legal Opinion
Geisert v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 24, 1993No. 92-L-111PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board, appeals a June 19, 1992 judgment entry reversing appellant's December 20, 1991 adjudication order revoking James H. Geisert's status as a motor vehicle dealer.
Initially, on August 9, 1991, appellee was notified that he was being afforded an opportunity to have a hearing pursuant to R.C. Chapter 119 to determine whether his license as a motor vehicle dealer should be suspended or revoked.
On September 10, 1991, at appellee's request, a hearing was set, but appellee's attorney requested a continuance. The continuance was granted and a hearing was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Lorain City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Cite as Cook v. MaxwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- State Employment Relations Bd. v. Hubbard Township TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Pioneer Chevrolet-Cadillac, Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Dealers BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jurek v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- J. Jesus Carreras and Los Primos Auto Sales, LLC d/b/a Los Primos Auto Sales v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- J. Jesus Carreras and Los Primos Auto Sales, LLC d/b/a Los Primos Auto Sales v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- J. Jesus Carreras and Los Primos Auto Sales, LLC d/b/a Los Primos Auto Sales v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- Jurek v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1994