In re the Marriage of Jacobson

I originally dissented in this case because I believed that the unfortunate effect of the majority opinion was to render unenforceable any and all stipulated, court-approved provisions in dissolution decrees providing for a future change in custody. Now, I write separately for an additional reason. The majority quite properly has granted reconsideration to father so that it can consider trial court Exhibit U, which-—due to an error by the trial court clerk’s office — had not been included in the court record for our original review. Like the majority, until now I have not had the opportunity…