State v. Jasmann

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Matthew Alan Jasmann appeals from a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict finding hiin guilty of gross sexual imposition. We affirm the judgment concluding the State did not commit prose-cutorial misconduct, the failure of the district court to give a cautionary instruction did not amount to obvious error, and sufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict.

I

[¶ 2] According to trial testimony, Jas-mann met his family members and friends at a local bar. While at the bar, Jasmann met A.W. who was with one of Jasmann’s relatives. When the bar was about to close, some of the…