Legal Opinion

Bjerken v. Ames Sand and Gravel Company

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1973No. Civ. 8829PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*886TEIGEN, Judge.

This is the sequel to Bjerken v. Ames Sand and Gravel Company, 189 N.W.2d 366 (N.D.1971). All of the issues except one were settled in that appeal. We reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case with instructions to the trial court “to determine the amount due the Bjerkens by the defendants Schultz & Lindsay Company and Ames Sand and Gravel Company, Inc., pursuant to the minimum requirements of the lease without considering the payments made by Schultz & Lindsay Company for the reject sand.” The trial court erroneously construed our remand to require a new…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Le Pire v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BarlowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. LeBarron v. City of HarvardNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mongeon v. BurkebileNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Schott v. EnanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dobler v. MalloyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Oakes Farming Ass'n v. Martinson Bros.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. OlmsteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Koch Oil Co. v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. YodsnukisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API