Legal Opinion

Kane v. Rippey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Jackson county: L. R. Webster, Judge. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is an action to recover money paid on a contract for the sale of land. It arose out of substantially these facts: That the defendants agreed with plaintiff in writing to convey to him “in fee simple, clear of all incumbrances whatsoever, by a good and sufficient deed, and abstracts of title, the following parcel of land,” etc.; that at the execution of said agreement, the plaintiff paid to the defendants the sum of five hundred dollars, as provided therein, and as the first payment on said land; that prior to bringing this action, the plaintiff tendered the further sum of three thousand…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Lessenich v. SellersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Larson v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API