Schneider v. Schneider
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-appellants, Harold and Joan Schneider, seek relief from the trial court’s final order dismissing their partition suit and assessing costs wholly against them. The pro se brief 1 appears to present a single assignment of error to the effect that this final order was “contrary to the facts and the evidence in this case.” We believe this attempt to state an assignment of error misses the point, and in order to consider the merits of appellants’ claims of error without being diverted by procedural considerations, we deem the assignment of error to be that the final order appealed from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beach, Jr. v. BeachOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- Bloomberg v. Roach, Recr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Foureman v. FouremanOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Hoefner v. KorachOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re CarrollOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sky Bank v. MamoneOhio Court of Appeals · 2009