Arnot v. Bingham
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Chemung county. Action by Mathias H. Arnot and others against Charles L. Bingham, receiver of the First National Bank of Dansville, N. Y., and others. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The plaintiffs were copartners, carrying on a general banking business at Elmira, N. Y., under the firm name of the Chemung Canal Bank. The First National Bank of Dansville, N. Y., was a banking corporation duly organized under the laws of the United States, and doing business at Dansville, N. Y. Prior to August, 1887, a note, made by a corporation doing business at Dansville, for $450, due August 19, 1887, was owned by the plaintiffs. It was payable at the First National Bank of Dansville. The maker kept an ordinary open account with that bank. The plaintiffs sent the note to the Dansville…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- National Park Bank of New York v. Seaboard BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Cutler v. American Exchange National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Matter of International M. Co. (Broderick)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. New State Bank of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In re Bank of CubaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Schafer v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.