Legal Opinion

Ray v. New York Bay Extension Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Frederick W. Ray, individually and as executor, etc., of Flora L. Ray, deceased, and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 15th day of November, 1899, denying a motion to confirm the report of a referee in the proceeding to punish the defendant for contempt, and remitting the proceeding to the referee to complete the reference. ,

1Opinion of the Court

Willard Bartlett, J.:

This case has already been twice before the Appellate Division and twice before the Court of Appeals. (20 App. Div. 539; appeal dismissed, 155 N. Y. 102; 34 App. Div. 3; appeal dismissed, 158 N. Y. 702.)

The judgment in the action awarded to the former plaintiff, Flora L. Ray, $500 damages, with costs, against the defendant, and granted a perpetual injunction against the maintenance of the defendant’s embankment in front of said plaintiff’s premises, unless the defendant should either (1) pay to the plaintiff within sixty • days the sum of $2,000, or (2) within the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ray v. New York Bay Extension RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Ray v. New York Bay Extension RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Ray v. New York Bay Extension RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Parka Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. Francis W. Kurtz & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API