Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & McGill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition granted and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in refusing to grant the petition seeking a stay of underinsurance arbitration and a declaration that the offset provision in the underinsured motorist coverage endorsement of the supplementary uninsured motorist coverage issued by petitioner to respondent is enforceable (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Stolarz—N. J. Mfrs. Ins. Co.], 81 NY2d 219; Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [Magyar], 217 AD2d 954). We reject respondent’s contention…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- MATTER OF VALENTE v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re the Arbitration Between Travelers Insurance & MagyarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re Arbitration between Exchange InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fazio v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Arbitration between Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & HollingsworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Spindler & New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001