Legal Opinion

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 20, 2016PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Deren Manasevit, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 1, 140 A.3d 402 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the habeas court incorrectly rendered judgment for the respondent on the petitioner's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to portions of the testimony of Tanika McCotter in a transcript admitted under the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, on the ground that they were 'double hearsay'?"

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eubanks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018