State v. Dangerfield

STEVEN R. PLOTKIN, Judge.

The first issue in this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it permitted the State’s witness to comment on the defendant’s behavior prior to his participation in a line up. The other issue is whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence. For the reasons below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant Jake Dangerfield was charged by bill of information with one count of first-degree robbery in violation of La. R.S. 14:64.1. Defendant pled not guilty. He was tried by a…