Legal Opinion

Clark v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1923No. 13654PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Complaint; from Hart superior court — Judge W. L. Hodges. April 22, 1922. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The record showing a bona fide attempt by the plaintiff's in error to present the required brief of the evidence, which is sufficient to enable this court to pass upon the assignments of error, the motion to dismiss is denied.

2. “ Where one purchasing real estate has the opportunity of examining it before buying, but, instead of doing so, voluntarily relies upon the statements of the vendor concerning its character and value, the contract will not be rescinded or set aside, or the purchase-price, of the land abated, because of the falsity of such statements, unless some fraud or artifice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tallent v. CrimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Dean v. Merchants & Farmers BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Dean v. Merchants & Farmers BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gaultney v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Boston Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Martin v. North Georgia Lumber Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Love v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Newbern v. MilhollinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API