Hare v. Dean
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On Exceptions by Dependant. Costs on demurrer: Counsel cited: Colton v. Stanwood, 67 Maine, 27 ; Slate v. Peck, 60 Maine, 498; Maine Central Institute v. Haskell, 71 Maine, 491; Shorey v. Chandler, 80 Maine, 409. Right of action: Gilley Gilley, 79 Maine, 294; Emery v. Gowen, 4 Maine, 88. Allegation of time: Gilmore v. Mathews, 67 Maine, 517; Platt y. Jones, 59 Maine, 232; Cole v. Babcock, 78 Maine, 41; Gray v. Sidelinger, 72 Maine, 114.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, J.
This is an action on the case for enticing the plaintiff’s daughter to leave their home and service. The case *310comes to the law court on exceptions based on tbe following record, viz: “At tbe return term the defendant filed a general demurrer to tbe writ and declaration wbicb was duly joined and tbe demurrer was sustained. Plaintiffs then moved to amend tbeir writ by inserting an ad damnum of one thousand dollars at tbe end of tbeir declaration where none bad been inserted before, which amendment was allowed. To this allowance of tbe amendment tbe defendant excepted. After tbe amendment was…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- DiRuggiero v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Robichaud v. Napoleon St. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Baxter v. MacgowanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.