Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pansiera

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In Disciplinary Counsel v. McCrae (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 511, 664 N.E.2d 523, we considered an attorney’s conviction for conduct not directly relating to the practice of law and pointed out that the Ethical Considerations adopted as a part of our Code of Professional Responsibility state that a lawyer “should refrain from all illegal and morally reprehensible conduct. Because of *438his position in society, even minor violations of law by a lawyer may tend to lessen public confidence in the legal profession.” EC 1-5.

While respondent in this case had no lawyer-client relationship with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McCraeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RidenbaughOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldblattOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. LinnenOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoodmanOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Polizzi (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API