Legal Opinion

Village of Deerfield v. Rapka

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 22, 1971No. 70-86PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Forbes

The plaintiff, Village of Deerfield, filed a petition to condemn defendants’ land consisting of 127 acres, which lies outside of and adjacent to the village limits, for a recreational center. The defendants filed a traverse and motion to dismiss contending among other things: 1) that plaintiff does not have the power of condemnation outside of its corporate Emits for the estabEshment and maintenance of a playground or recreational center; 2) that the statute under which plaintiff sought to condemn insofar as it purports to authorize plaintiff to exercise the power of eminent domain outside…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carrigan v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re Estate of LeichtenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. City of Birmingham v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF COOK CTY. v. WikeIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. SchlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Village of Deerfield v. RapkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Peoria v. KeehnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. City of Peoria v. KeehnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Village of Deerfield v. RapkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API