Village of Deerfield v. Rapka
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Forbes
The plaintiff, Village of Deerfield, filed a petition to condemn defendants’ land consisting of 127 acres, which lies outside of and adjacent to the village limits, for a recreational center. The defendants filed a traverse and motion to dismiss contending among other things: 1) that plaintiff does not have the power of condemnation outside of its corporate Emits for the estabEshment and maintenance of a playground or recreational center; 2) that the statute under which plaintiff sought to condemn insofar as it purports to authorize plaintiff to exercise the power of eminent domain outside…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carrigan v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re Estate of LeichtenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Birmingham v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF COOK CTY. v. WikeIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. SchlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Village of Deerfield v. RapkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Peoria v. KeehnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- City of Peoria v. KeehnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Village of Deerfield v. RapkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1973