Legal Opinion
United States v. Jesus Cervantes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 17, 2012No. 09-50521PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
ORDER
The majority opinion and dissent in this case have been amended and filed. The majority has voted to not entertain future petitions for rehearing. No future petitions for rehearing will be entertained, and the mandate shall issue forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Jesus Antonio Ramos Cervantes appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in his vehicle. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
BACKGROUND
On March 25, 2009, Detective Todd Hankel of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Rafael Sandoval v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jimmy TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- State of Tennessee v. Kenneth McCormickTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Lamya Brewster v. Charlie BeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. John UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.