Legal Opinion
Buller v. Buller
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1944No. Civ. 14251PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
This is an action for the determination of plaintiff’s interest in community property which, the complaint alleges, consists of Lot 62 of Chancellor’s Tract No. 1, (also herein referred to as Chanslor Tract No. 1), situated in Riverside County, “together with a certain number of cattle, located on a ranch in Riverside County, California, an automobile, an interest in certain ranch property located in Riverside County, California, certain bales of cotton, honey, alfalfa seed ...”
The complaint also alleges that no disposition was made of said community property in that certain divorce action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- De Godey v. GodeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Biggi v. BiggiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Tabler v. PeverillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Buller v. BullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Blache v. BlacheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Buller v. BullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Fehlhaber v. FehlhaberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.