Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Netterville v. Interfirst Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1986No. 09 86 003 CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

BURGESS, Justice.

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in a Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) case.

Craig Netterville (Netterville) had a passbook savings account with Interfirst Bank (Bank) which had been in existence sometime prior to the events described in the lawsuit. In October 1984, the bank sent a notice to all its passbook savings account holders that effective January 1, 1985, a $10 per quarter service charge would be assessed to any account whose balance dropped below $300 during the quarter. An additional reminder about the service…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McCrea v. Cubilla Condominium Corp. N.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of San Antonio v. Ritenour, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. City of Coppell v. General Homes Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Brasher v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Park v. Troy Dodson Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988
  5. Brown v. Bettinger, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API