Legal Opinion
Herron v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 7, 1985No. 83 C 4259PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement reached in this case, and plaintiffs’ motion to amend their third verified complaint purportedly to conform the pleadings to the evidence adduced at trial. Plaintiffs seek to amend their complaint, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 15(b), by adding claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988. For the reasons stated below, we grant defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement, and deny plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint.
The Settlement
In their third verified complaint,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Meetings & Expositions, Inc. v. Tandy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Edward Brown v. Robert E. L. Culpepper, Jr., Superior Court Judge of the South Georgia Judicial CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Schek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Employer's Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Lewis v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- In Re Evanston Beauty Supply, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Dickinson v. Indiana State Election BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
- Mattingly v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.