Legal Opinion

Syngenta Crop Protection Inc. v. Drexel Chemical Company

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 24, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2008-1627Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-1627 (JDB) DREXEL CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. ("Syngenta") and defendant Drexel Chemical Company ("Drexel") are currently engaged in a binding arbitration proceeding initiated under the data-sharing provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"),

7 U.S.C. §§ 136

et seq. Syngenta seeks a declaratory judgment that the arbitration panel cannot consider a 1993 Agreement and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.