Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 2018No. CV-18-147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid M. Glover, Judge

An administrative law judge (ALJ) found appellant Felecia Davenport was not entitled to temporary total-disability benefits (TTD) for the period from February 17, 2015, to a date to be determined. Specifically, the ALJ found appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,1 (Wal-Mart) has at all times made suitable employment available to Davenport within her physical restrictions until such time Davenport left work and never returned, and Davenport failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence her entitlement to TTD. The Workers'

*438Compensation Commission (Commission) affirmed and adopted the ALJ's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edens v. Superior Marble & GlassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Templeton v. Dollar General StoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Johnson v. Abilities Unlimited, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Watts v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Turcios v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shirley Hines v. Central Arkansas Transit Authority and Risk ManagementCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Lybyer v. Springdale Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Searcy School District and Arkansas School Boards Association v. Bobby AllenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API