Legal Opinion
State v. Chambers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 16, 1953No. 577PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.
The defendant noted exception to and assigns as error the following instructions given to the jury by the court:
“Then on the count of larceny, gentlemen, there is this rule of law: Where a defendant is found in possession of property feloniously stolen and that possession is so recent from the time it was stolen that (he) could not have reasonably gotten the possession of that property without stealing it; if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was in possession of the property and it had been feloniously stolen, then there is the presumption that the one in recent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- In Re the Will of WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970