Legal Opinion

In re Mulqueen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

This is an appeal from a decree of the surrogate construing the will of the decedent. The question involved is whether a child *638born subsequent to the making of the will is entitled to share in the estate of the decedent as though he had died intestate, and there being no question of any settlement herein, this depends upon whether the after-born child was provided for or in any way mentioned in the will of the testator. (Decedent Estate Law, § 26.) That section provides in its pertinent portion as follows:

“ Whenever a testator shall, have a child bom after the making of a last will,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. United States Trust Co. v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. McLean v. . McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Wormser v. CroceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Stachelberg v. . StachelbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Re-Probate of the Last Will & Testament of JonesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. In re the Estate of DoolingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of LachenmeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API