State v. Covington
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The question is whether the bad check statute, N. J. S. A. 2A:111-15 to 17, superseded the false pretense statute, N. J. 8. A. 2A:111-1, when the instrument of the fraud is a worthless check. The maximum authorized punishment under the bad check statute is less than under the false pretense statute. The Appellate Division held the false pretense statute continued to apply. 113 N. J. Super. 229 (1971). That result conflicted with the decision of another part of the Appellate Division in State v. Morse, 109 N. J. Super. 160 (1970). We granted certification to resolve the conflict. 58 N. J. 329…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MedinaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- State v. FoleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. BlountSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- State v. GregorioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- State v. CoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.