Legal Opinion

State v. Hagler

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 26, 2009No. 61107-1-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

208 P.3d 32 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Warren Donell HAGLER, Appellant.

No. 61107-1-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

May 26, 2009.

Andrew Zinner, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Daniel Kalish, James Whisman, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

PUBLISHED IN PART

AGID, J.

¶ 1 Under chapter 10.99 RCW, certain crimes are designated by the prosecutor or the court as domestic violence crimes. It is neither necessary nor advisable to inform the jury that charges have been designated as domestic violence crimes under chapter 10.99 RCW. In this case, however, doing so was harmless. We affirm…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WinborneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. WinborneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. Abdi-IssaWashington Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State Of Washington v. Charmarke Abdi-issaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington v. Donald L. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API