Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Patricia Figareau

TAMPA DIVISION PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:19-cv-545-JDW-AEP PATRICIA FIGAREAU, FRANTZ PAUL, MARIA D. TEJEDOR and DIEZ- ARGUELLES & TEJEDOR, P.A., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER Publix objects to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation recommending that its Motion(s) for Attorney’s Fees be denied (Dkts. 136, 138). After a de novo review, I find that Publix’ objections should be overruled and the Report and Recommendation accepted.1 Accordingly, Publix’ Motion(s) for Attorney’s Fees (Dkts. 106, 129) are DENIED. Publix, as Plan…