Legal Opinion

Oneida County v. Kirk Bangstad and Minocqua Brewing Company LLC

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 22, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00520Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ONEIDA COUNTY, Plaintiff, v. OPINION and ORDER KIRK BANGSTAD and MINOCQUA BREWING 25-cv-520-jdp COMPANY LLC, Defendants. The court remanded this case to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court also concluded that Oneida County was entitled to attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) because the removal was not objectively reasonable. The county now seeks $8,795.50 in fees, which includes $6,100.50 for opposing the removal and $2,695 for supporting their fee petition.1 Defendants object to the fee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API