Legal Opinion

Noland v. Arnold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1914No. 11410PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered January 9, 1913, dismissing consolidated actions to quiet title, after a trial on the merits to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This controversy first came into the superior court for King county in the form of three separate actions, instituted by the plaintiffs, seeking to quiet their title to different tracts of land claimed by the defendants Arnolds, Chamberlins, and Larsens, separately, under certain tax foreclosure proceedings, which they claimed divested the plaintiffs of title to the land. It appearing that the respective rights of the parties to these actions rested upon controlling facts in substance the same, the actions were, by order of the superior court, consolidated. Thereafter, new pleadings were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Williams v. PittockWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Woodham v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Gould v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Dolan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carrie Spooner Case v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API