Davis v. Strople
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Suit by Julia Davis Strople against Gladys Gwendolyn Davis and others to quiet title. From a final decree quieting title, the defendants appeal.
Affirmed. We have here an appeal from a final decree quieting title. The sufficiency of the bill was before us in Davis v. Strople,158 Fla. 614, 29 So.2d 364, where we denied certiorari under Rule 34. The contents of the bill are there stated in the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Buford.
We are now asked to re-examine the bill and also to hold the evidence insufficient to sustain the decree. By reason of our previous decisions we will not now, a…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunter v. TynerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Hager v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Davis v. StropleSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Tribune Co. v. Public RecordsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State v. KokalSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- City of Tampa v. Thatcher Glass Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Ocasio v. BUREAU OF CRIMES, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.