Howard v. Village of West Randolph
Supreme Court of Vermont
Petition to the Supreme Court for Orange County at its May Term, 1909, by the plaintiff in the above entitled cause, to bring it forward and to strike off the judgment therein rendered in his favor in April, 1892, as reported in 64 Vt. 41. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is a motion or petition to bring forward the above entitled cause and to strike off the judgment therein rendered in favor of the petitioner in April, 1892, seventeen years ago.
From the petition, and the concessions of the petitioner in his brief or in oral argument, it appears that in 1887 the water commissioners of the defendant village, proceeding under No. 238 of the Acts of 1886, after a hearing of which the petitioner had notice and which he attended, took for the village certain water and water rights of the petitioner; that the commissioners awarded the petitioner as damages the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Boyd v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pierce v. Somerset RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Van Dyke v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- Stearns v. City of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- In Re MosesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- McDurfee v. BuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Thompson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911