Legal Opinion

Milk Factors

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided December 12, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bard, Attorney General,

Receipt is acknowledged of your recent inquiry, wherein you request our opinion as to the legality of a certain purported agreement between milk dealers and milk producers, and whether the Milk Control Law or orders of the Milk Control Commission issued thereunder are applicable to said agreement.

The purported agreement may be summarized as follows : The milk dealer, described in the agreement as a “factor”, agrees to accept on consignment, for the purpose of processing and selling, any milk so consigned by producers. It is recited that the producer retains title to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rohrer v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Weston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Carolene Products Co. v. HarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. First National Bank v. SchweenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API