Legal Opinion

People v. Villa

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 2007No. B195363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Antonio Espinoza Villa (appellant) was convicted of one count of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), for which the alleged victim was a store employee.1 He also was convicted of one count of petty theft with a prior theft-related conviction (§ 666), for which the alleged victim was the store itself. We will refer to that crime as petty theft with a prior. He contends: (1) There was insufficient evidence that he committed robbery. (2) His conviction…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. ChampionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re E.A. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. P. v. Deville CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. Alem CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. Barksdale CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API