Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 26, 2006No. 03 C 3578Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Que Te Park (“Defendant” or “Park”) moves to amend his answer to Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) complaint to assert the affirmative defenses of res judicata and collateral estoppel. The FTC claims that: (1) Defendant has waived his right to assert these defenses, and (2) both defenses are without merit. For the purposes of this motion, the Court limits its inquiry to whether Defendant should be allowed to amend his answer and does not address the merits of the defenses. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ballweg v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics Corporation, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Eulah Williams v. John Lampe and Village of Cahokia Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. 32 soc.sec.rep.ser. 494, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15908a Esther Marcus v. Louis v. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Rogers v. DesiderioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API