Legal Opinion

Resendez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1973No. 46359PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of burglary with intent to commit theft. Punishment, enhanced under the provisions of Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., was assessed at life.

This is a circumstantial evidence case.

Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient. We hold that the evidence is insufficient and reverse the conviction.

Sometime during the night of September 15, 1971, the office of Dr. Robert Haan was burglarized. A safe containing drugs, bonds, other papers and cash was taken.

An initial investigation by Officer Brice Petry of the El Paso police…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Pogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Dominguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Suff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Fernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API