De Nardo v. De Nardo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtThacher, J.
We are concerned, in this case for annulment of a marriage, with the meaning of the words “ lunatic ” and 11 lunacy ’ ’. Formerly insane persons were divided into two categories: lunatics who, having been of sound mind, have lost their reason and were supposed to enjoy lucid periods, and idiots, who were without understanding from birth (1 Blackstone’s Comm., 302-304). In the trial of this case-the Trial Justice used and defined “ lunatic ” as a person of unsound mind who is mentally deranged but may have intermittent lucid intervals. But in this lawsuit the term has a meaning defined by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weinberg v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Meekins v. KinsellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- In re JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Levine v. DumbraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- State v. BillhymerArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Wilson v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.