Legal Opinion

De Nardo v. De Nardo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThacher, J.

We are concerned, in this case for annulment of a marriage, with the meaning of the words “ lunatic ” and 11 lunacy ’ ’. Formerly insane persons were divided into two categories: lunatics who, having been of sound mind, have lost their reason and were supposed to enjoy lucid periods, and idiots, who were without understanding from birth (1 Blackstone’s Comm., 302-304). In the trial of this case-the Trial Justice used and defined “ lunatic ” as a person of unsound mind who is mentally deranged but may have intermittent lucid intervals. But in this lawsuit the term has a meaning defined by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Meekins v. KinsellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. In re JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Levine v. DumbraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. State v. BillhymerArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wilson v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API