Legal Opinion
In Re Soost
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 6, 2003No. 19-03012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF PLAN AND DISMISSING CASE
GREGORY F. KISHEL, Chief Judge.
This Chapter 13 case came on before the Court on November 27, 2002, for an evi-dentiary hearing on the confirmation of the Debtor’s Fifth Modified Plan. The Debtor appeared personally and by his attorney, David F. Frundt. NAH, Inc., d/b/a Nor-daas American Homes (“NAH”) appeared by its attorney, Donald W. Savelkoul. Upon the evidence received at the hearing and the arguments and memoranda of counsel, the Court memorializes the following decision pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) and Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9014.
THE…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Long v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Long and Wife v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Education Assistance Corporation v. William Wesley ZellnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re SoppickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Seaver v. Markey (In Re Markey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- In Re KurtzahnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- In re HopperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2012
- In Re BarrowsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.