Legal Opinion

United States v. Continental Group, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1978No. Crim. 76-514PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On October 29, 1976, Continental Group, Inc. (“Continental”), American Bag & Paper Corporation (“American”), Chase Bag Company (“Chase”), Harley Corporation (“Harley”), St. Regis Paper Company (“St. Regis”), James K. Cooper (“Cooper”), David Mawicke (“Mawicke”), Peter J. Weggeman (“Weggeman”), Stanley A. Schottland (“Schottland”), Harrison B. Rue (“Rue”), William H. Versfelt (“Versfelt”) and Edward W. Weikum (“Weikum”) were charged in a one-count indictment with having engaged, together with several unindicted coconspirators, 1 in a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis C. Andrus, George E. Collett, William J. Lutson, Billy Ray Whittington, and Larry Thomas WhittingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Mid-West Paper Products Co. v. Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. United States v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API