Legal Opinion

United States v. Dario Restrepo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1990No. 88-3207PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Dario Restrepo appeals his forty-six month prison sentence imposed after he was convicted of two counts of distribution of cocaine. The primary issue before us is whether the district court erred in considering conduct that did not result in Restre-*650po’s conviction in determining his offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines. We also consider the standard of proof to be used to establish a factor enhancing a sentence under the Guidelines, and whether the application of the June 15, 1988 Guidelines to Restrepo violated the ex post facto clause. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. Dario RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David SklarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Edwin Sanchez, United States of America v. Gregorio Rosario, United States of America v. Rafael SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Eddie Lee GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API