Legal Opinion
State v. Nevarez
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 2009No. 34692, 34902PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Chief Judge.
In separate eases that were consolidated for oral argument on appeal, Nevarez and Jimenez entered conditional guilty pleas to robbery, reserving the right to appeal from the denial of their respective motions for public funds to hire an expert witness and motions to suppress evidence.
I
BACKGROUND
At about 1 a.m. on October 27, 2006, Deputy Joe Moore of the Minidoka County Sheriffs Department was patrolling when he heard a dispatch stating that a Rupert convenience store had just been robbed at gunpoint by two Hispanic individuals. Moore, located about eight miles away,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. HedgecockIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. KesslerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. HedgecockIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009