Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1975No. 2-1274A306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, J.

The defendant, Alonzo Johnson, was found guilty as charged of the crime of conspiracy to commit a felony, to-wit: uttering a forged instrument. This appeal is addressed only to the sufficiency of the evidence, it being charged that the State failed to prove the elements of knowledge of falsity and intent to defraud, both of which are essential to a conviction.

The evidence, viewed most favorably to the State, discloses that on the evening of April 14, 1973, the defendant, Alonzo Johnson, met with Robert Hudson concerning some fifty dollars the defendant owed Mr. Hudson. The defendant told Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McAfee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Finger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Gennaitte v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Reid v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Hopper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Survance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Freeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lewis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Moses v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Gresham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API