Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blodgett v. Koenig

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 21, 1926Published

1Dissent

I do not agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the majority opinion.

The plaintiff, an attorney at law, sued the defendant on a contract for the balance, $14,000, due the former for legal services. Tried to a jury there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $7,000 and interest. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

The Pleadings: The petition alleges, in substance, that defendant was indicted by the Federal grand jury on October 11, 1918; that plaintiff was employed by defendant in connection with the law firm of Frumberg Russell to defend him and received a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Mills v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Morton v. ForseeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Hurt v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Shoemaker v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API