Blodgett v. Koenig
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Dissent
I do not agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the majority opinion.
The plaintiff, an attorney at law, sued the defendant on a contract for the balance, $14,000, due the former for legal services. Tried to a jury there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $7,000 and interest. From this judgment the defendant appeals.
The Pleadings: The petition alleges, in substance, that defendant was indicted by the Federal grand jury on October 11, 1918; that plaintiff was employed by defendant in connection with the law firm of Frumberg Russell to defend him and received a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Mills v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Morton v. ForseeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Hurt v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Shoemaker v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.