Legal Opinion

People v. Roman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 14, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Judgment of conviction, rendered July 12, 2006, reversed, on the law, plea vacated, information dismissed, and surcharge remitted.

Defendant’s pre-plea motion to dismiss the information as jurisdictionally defective should have been granted, since the information did not set forth “nonhearsay allegations which, if true, establish every element of the offense[s] charged and the defendant’s commission thereof’ (People v Henderson, 92 NY2d 677, 679 [1999]; see CPL 100.40 [1] [c]). Fatal to the information insofar as it charged defendant with attempted criminal possession of a…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. MercedesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
  4. People v. RodriquezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Nichols (Heather)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API