Legal Opinion
United States v. Durham
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 23, 2015No. Case No. CR-14-231-RPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a Motion to Suppress Kim Kimberling’s Counseling Records (Doc. No. 62), to which the United States has responded. The Court conducted a hearing on the issue on February 4, 2015, advising- the parties at the hearing that the issue would be taken under advisement. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and finds as follows.
The issue before the Court is whether Defendant’s records as compiled by Dr. Kimberling are privileged such that the government, via grand jury subpoena, was not entitled to discovery thereof.
The Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena, MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.